AI.IQ · Visibility scoreboard

10-query results: 8 of 10

Per-query detail behind the AI visibility scoreboard: 10 content-aligned queries, the published Bailey article behind each one, separate DuckDuckGo and Brave positions, and an honest record of any engine that was unavailable during the run.

Per-query results

# Query DuckDuckGo Brave Outcome Published content
1 what does a land development feasibility study tell you in Southern Idaho #1 #5 ✓ pass
2 is stormwater detention required in the Treasure Valley #1 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
3 how long does the entitlement process take in Ada County #1 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
4 what are the 9 phases of land development in Southern Idaho #1 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
5 why is RS4 zoning attractive for land development in Nampa #2 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
6 Eagle Idaho residential density cap compliance #2 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
7 Syringa Crossing Meridian remand #1 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
8 Storyrock Meridian planning and zoning 321 homes #1 Not in top 10 ✓ pass
9 how does a land use planner improve development approvals Not in top 10 Unavailable ✗ miss
10 how can AI improve civil engineering plan quality Not in top 10 Unavailable ✗ miss

What the misses tell us

Because every query now has a published content target, a miss points to discoverability, phrasing, or internal-linking work rather than an article Bailey has not written.

  • Q9 — how does a land use planner improve development approvals No Bailey result appeared in DuckDuckGo's measured top 10. Brave was unavailable after a verification challenge, so this is a measured-engine miss rather than a completed two-engine result.
  • Q10 — how can AI improve civil engineering plan quality No Bailey result appeared in DuckDuckGo's measured top 10. Brave was unavailable after a verification challenge, so this is a measured-engine miss rather than a completed two-engine result.

Methodology, expanded

The test asks a narrower, reproducible question: can a search system find Bailey for the same buyer-intent queries a person might give an AI assistant? It does not query ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Perplexity directly, and it does not claim that a search rank guarantees an AI citation.

  • DuckDuckGo HTML was run with the US English region and provides a repeatable view without a personalized account.
  • Brave Search supplies a second independent result set; only organic links count, not the generated answer above them.
  • Top-10 union scoring counts a pass when Bailey appears in either result set.
  • Unavailable is not a miss: an engine must return a valid result set before a no-rank result is recorded. If both engines are unavailable, the query remains unscored.
  • Direct AI citation testing would require a separately controlled, dated test across each assistant and is not represented by this table.

Union scoring is more generous than the original intersection-style baseline, which counted only queries where Bailey ranked across multiple engines. The recorded 8/10 measured result therefore measures search discoverability under this specific method. It should not be read as “Bailey appears in 8 AI answers.”

Feedback